Mens et Manus

As the semester draws to a close, I look back on the last few months and wonder where the time went. It seemed that just yesterday, my classmates and I were being introduced to New Orleans. It's amazing to see what we've all learned in just a few short months time.

When I talk about this class to my family and friends, I stress the way in which we were all encouraged to apply what we learned in class to our project. MIT prides itself on urging its students to participate in a hands-on education. We are told from day one never to be satisfied with a theoretical lesson when it can be applied somewhere and benefit the world. This class was a prime example and something I truly appreciate as I approach my final year at MIT.

In the last semester, all of us were able to travel to a city far away, talk to real people, and discuss real solutions to various problems faced by New Orleans. This is not an opportunity given to many others, and I am reminded every day of how lucky we are to go to such an amazing institution. I truly loved this past semester in 11.027 and hope to take what I've learned with me in the future. Hopefully, I can return one day and see how our beloved Federal City has fared. 

An Engineer versus a Planner

While working on our final projects and posters recently, we've been talking about effective design and aesthetics. Coming from an engineering background, this kind of thinking is very new to me. I think it's so interesting to compare the way an engineer designs to the way a planner does. (I'm making broad generalizations here, so take these with a grain of salt.)

A planner considers their product--either a report, poster, powerpoint, portfolio, etc.-- a visual object meant to entertain and inform the viewer. It is not enough for the product to convey the information; it has to do so in a way that is "visually appealing." Suddenly, there are other aspects that are just as important as the data or information, aspects such as the color scheme, even the font! An engineer couldn't care less about the font; as long as the diagrams are legible and the information is present and conveyed, they're happy.

This distinction came to mind when I walked through the civil engineering labs on the third floor of building 1. On a chalk board in the hallway, a professor had scrawled "PhD defense for student xyz Thursday 1pm". There was no punctuation, no emphasis, no color; just a basic description spelled out in the clearest way possible. The theses themselves are similar, formed by a combination of plain font and direct language that results in a somewhat lackluster visual, in my opinion.

I wonder if there is a way to blend both styles, the direct and clean approach of engineers with the more aesthetically focused and lively approach of the planners. I think that the negatives of each style are balanced the positives of the other. I'd hope to reach some kind of middle ground, perhaps in this class but also in others and after MIT. I think this blend is a really valuable point of view to use, and I'm glad that I've come into this class with an engineering background because it's helped me see the strengths and weaknesses of both. 

My favorite parts of the Algiers Project

Working on our project for the Councilmember's office has been an amazing experience so far. While conducting the research and interviews over the phone have provided us with interesting information, my favorite parts of this project are those where we interacted with true New Orleanians first-hand. Of all the meetings Emma and I had in our short visit to the city, I enjoyed the initial meeting with Councilmember Palmer and her team the most. This meeting, while only about an hour long, gave me incredible insight into a few components of work in politics.

When Councilmember Palmer showed up in running clothes and out of breath, it was a reminder that politicians are still people; they live their own lives and have their own priorities to consider. I think that too often Americans lose sight of that fact and expect their city councilor or their senator to do exactly what they want, when they want. It was refreshing to see the Councilmember crack jokes and be a "real person," not just a robotic figurehead spouting stump speeches and talking points.

Sasha and Malia Obama, being normal teenagers (Us Magazine, 1/22/2013).

Another aspect of the job that I noticed was that the campaign is never over. Even if you've won the election, you have to ensure sure that your constituents are continuously happy and that you're holding on to their votes. Tia struck up a conversation with a few different people in the course of our meeting, and each time she made sure to listen to what they thought about Algiers and the current state of the city. Her job is to make sure that the community feels heard and included, and that doesn't stop once the votes are in.

The final realization I had didn't hit me fully until after speaking with Jeff Schwartz at the alumni dinner party. He warned Emma and I about the potential dangers of approaching the community with open-ended questions, since the average person may not know what is feasible and what is not. While at the coffeeshop with Tia, an Algiers resident suggested making a section of New Orleans (I forget which neighborhood) pedestrian-only and outlawing all car traffic. I have little knowledge of these things, but I would assume that the process of such a transition is not an easy one. From the look on Tia's face, it didn't seem like the suggestion was high on the Councilmember's priority list; but regardless, she sat there and listened to the man. That is her job year round.

These small examples of politicking gave me a really interesting background on what the interface between political organizations and everyday citizens can be like. I'm glad that not only am I getting planning experience through this project, but also an inside look at what it can be like working in local government. 

A Reflection on Sandy: Part Two

I've had some trouble thinking of what to write about on this blog, so please forgive my absence on the site. I thought going back to the comments made on earlier blogs would help. 

On my earlier post about Hurricane Sandy, the following comment was made: 

I think it is very interesting that you bring up the comparison of Sandy. I too felt a chilling connection between the two Hurricanes. What I find particularly interesting is the difference in response on the part of the federal government. While New York was almost back to running after a few days, New Orleans took years (and is still struggling) to repair a lot of the damage caused by Katrina. What do you think about this? Why did this happen? What didn't work in New Orleans?

From my perspective, there are a few major differences between New Orleans and New York City that allowed for a faster response after Hurricane Sandy. Firstly, I think that the political organizations in NY/NJ acted more efficiently than those of New Orleans in 2005. One of example of this is involved Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey. 

Acting against strong pressure from the GOP, Governor Christie worked closely and quickly with President Obama to bring relief to the Jersey Shore. The Governor got a lot of heat for his praise of the President's response (people are still talking about it), but many lauded him for choosing to help his constituents over his own party. Based on what we've learned about New Orleans, this type of action on the part of government officials did not occur post-Katrina. 

I doubt that this faster response can be solely attributed to the political makeup of NY/NJ; the nation saw what happened post-Katrina and knew that history repeating itself was not something we could afford. As devastating as Hurricane Katrina was to the population and physical components of New Orleans, Americans now have a better idea of what can happen if the government does not respond as it should. Steps have been taken in the years since Katrina so that our response system can be faster and more efficient than it was in 2005.